<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tool &#38; Dieing&#187; Union workers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.toolanddieing.com/tag/union-workers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.toolanddieing.com</link>
	<description>Dedicated to Rebuilding the North American Tooling Industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:10:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Community still fighting for GM Mansfield: Letter to GM CEO Henderson Questions Flint Plant</title>
		<link>http://blog.toolanddieing.com/2009/07/19/community-still-fighting-for-gm-mansfield-letter-to-gm-ceo-henderson-questions-flint-plant/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.toolanddieing.com/2009/07/19/community-still-fighting-for-gm-mansfield-letter-to-gm-ceo-henderson-questions-flint-plant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Automotive Tooling News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GM Tooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Motors metal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[save plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stamping plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stampings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union workers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.toolanddieing.com/?p=769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>For all intents and purposes the decision to close GM&#8217;s Mansfield, Ohio stamping plant has been made. However, community leaders, UAW officials and ex-employees are desparately trying to convince CEO Fritz Henderson to reconsider. Adding fuel to the fire is several recent reports claim the Mansfield plant was more productive&#8211;and profitable&#8211;then other GM plants to be spared. Feeling the pressure, the committe behind &#8216;Mansfield Makes Sense&#8217; pointed that out in their letter to Henderson.</p>
<p>Here is a copy of the letter&#8230;.Joe</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times-Roman;"></p>
<p align="left"><strong>To: Frederick “Fritz” Henderson, General Motors CEO</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Ron Bloom, Chair, President’s Auto Task Force</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>From: Mansfield Makes Sense for the New GM Committee</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Date: July 15, 2009</strong></p>
<p align="left">&#8220;If industrial communities want an explanation, then I&#8217;m sure they (GM) would go and talk to them. We</p>
<p align="left">expect the company to be as open and transparent as possible.”</p>
<p align="left">Ron Bloom, President Obama’s Auto Task Force member</p>
<p align="left">On behalf of the #1 performing stamping plant within General Motors, its 1,200 dedicated, hardworking</p>
<p align="left">employees and the communities within North Central Ohio that will be devastated by the</p>
<p align="left">announced closure of the Ontario-Mansfield Metal Center, we need your help in getting an explanation</p>
<p align="left">of what appears to be GM’s poor business decision to close this plant. We strongly believe that</p>
<p align="left">“Mansfield Makes Sense for the New GM” and that this plant is best-positioned to help the</p>
<p align="left">company succeed.</p>
<p align="left">We are requesting that you meet with us to review the material that we have compiled – data that comes</p>
<p align="left">from GM itself – that clearly demonstrates and validates the value of the plant to the company’s future.</p>
<p align="left">We understand that GM has to make some tough decisions to reorganize the company for the future, but,</p>
<p align="left">to date, we have not been given satisfactory answers to important facts and critical questions, including:</p>
<p align="left">• Mansfield was first in the GM Scorecard evaluation.</p>
<p align="left">• The cost per ton at Mansfield is the second lowest of the plants; without the added-in costs for laid-off</p>
<p align="left">workers, it’s the lowest.</p>
<p align="left">• Mansfield has the best Competitive Operating Agreement in the company, and served as the model for</p>
<p align="left">the other agreements that were reached.</p>
<p align="left">• Mansfield is the only plan that has met the company’s production goals in Strokes per Hour, Line</p>
<p align="left">Transition, and Hours Operated per Die Change</p>
<p align="left">In short, the plant and its workers have done all that the company asked of them – and then some – yet</p>
<p align="left">it’s become first on the chopping block. That doesn’t make sense and causes us to wonder about how the</p>
<p align="left">decision was reached.</p>
<p align="left">We – and the taxpayers of America, who collectively have a tremendous financial stake in the</p>
<p align="left">company – need to have a better explanation of this decision, particularly given the inordinate and is</p>
<p align="left">proportionate negative impact this closing will have on the community. The Mansfield-Ontario Metal</p>
<p align="left">Center has a $190,000,000 economic impact on the region; it represents 40% of the income tax revenue</p>
<p></span><span style="font-family: Times-Roman; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-family: Times-Roman; font-size: xx-small;"></p>
<p align="left">The GM logo is a registered trademark of General Motors Corporation</p>
<p></span></span><span style="font-family: Times-Roman;"></p>
<p align="left">for the City of Ontario (population 5,500). That level of economic damage is troubling and should be</p>
<p align="left">factored into the equation.</p>
<p align="left">Time is growing short. The dismantling of the plant is accelerating and – if it is allowed to proceed</p>
<p align="left">without a meaningful review – the company’s “asset” will have a dramatically decreased value. We</p>
<p align="left">urgently request a review and personal hearing with you to present the details of our case. A delegation</p>
<p align="left">from Mansfield will meet with you to present our case…any time, any place. We look forward to your</p>
<p align="left">prompt response.</p>
<p align="left">Sincerely,</p>
<p align="left">Kenneth Bender Donald Culliver Gary Utt</p>
<p align="left">Mayor of Ontario Mayor of Mansfield Richland County Commissioner</p>
<p align="left">cc: Mr. Ed Whitacre, Chairman GM Board of Directors</p>
<p>Members of the President&#8217;s Auto Task Force</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For all intents and purposes the decision to close GM&#8217;s Mansfield, Ohio stamping plant has been made. However, community leaders, UAW officials and ex-employees are desparately trying to convince CEO Fritz Henderson to reconsider. Adding fuel to the fire is several recent reports claim the Mansfield plant was more productive&#8211;and profitable&#8211;then other GM plants to be spared. Feeling the pressure, the committe behind &#8216;Mansfield Makes Sense&#8217; pointed that out in their letter to Henderson.</p>
<p>Here is a copy of the letter&#8230;.Joe</p>
<p><span style="font-family: Times-Roman;"></p>
<p align="left"><strong>To: Frederick “Fritz” Henderson, General Motors CEO</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Ron Bloom, Chair, President’s Auto Task Force</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>From: Mansfield Makes Sense for the New GM Committee</strong></p>
<p align="left"><strong>Date: July 15, 2009</strong></p>
<p align="left">&#8220;If industrial communities want an explanation, then I&#8217;m sure they (GM) would go and talk to them. We</p>
<p align="left">expect the company to be as open and transparent as possible.”</p>
<p align="left">Ron Bloom, President Obama’s Auto Task Force member</p>
<p align="left">On behalf of the #1 performing stamping plant within General Motors, its 1,200 dedicated, hardworking</p>
<p align="left">employees and the communities within North Central Ohio that will be devastated by the</p>
<p align="left">announced closure of the Ontario-Mansfield Metal Center, we need your help in getting an explanation</p>
<p align="left">of what appears to be GM’s poor business decision to close this plant. We strongly believe that</p>
<p align="left">“Mansfield Makes Sense for the New GM” and that this plant is best-positioned to help the</p>
<p align="left">company succeed.</p>
<p align="left">We are requesting that you meet with us to review the material that we have compiled – data that comes</p>
<p align="left">from GM itself – that clearly demonstrates and validates the value of the plant to the company’s future.</p>
<p align="left">We understand that GM has to make some tough decisions to reorganize the company for the future, but,</p>
<p align="left">to date, we have not been given satisfactory answers to important facts and critical questions, including:</p>
<p align="left">• Mansfield was first in the GM Scorecard evaluation.</p>
<p align="left">• The cost per ton at Mansfield is the second lowest of the plants; without the added-in costs for laid-off</p>
<p align="left">workers, it’s the lowest.</p>
<p align="left">• Mansfield has the best Competitive Operating Agreement in the company, and served as the model for</p>
<p align="left">the other agreements that were reached.</p>
<p align="left">• Mansfield is the only plan that has met the company’s production goals in Strokes per Hour, Line</p>
<p align="left">Transition, and Hours Operated per Die Change</p>
<p align="left">In short, the plant and its workers have done all that the company asked of them – and then some – yet</p>
<p align="left">it’s become first on the chopping block. That doesn’t make sense and causes us to wonder about how the</p>
<p align="left">decision was reached.</p>
<p align="left">We – and the taxpayers of America, who collectively have a tremendous financial stake in the</p>
<p align="left">company – need to have a better explanation of this decision, particularly given the inordinate and is</p>
<p align="left">proportionate negative impact this closing will have on the community. The Mansfield-Ontario Metal</p>
<p align="left">Center has a $190,000,000 economic impact on the region; it represents 40% of the income tax revenue</p>
<p></span><span style="font-family: Times-Roman; font-size: xx-small;"><span style="font-family: Times-Roman; font-size: xx-small;"></p>
<p align="left">The GM logo is a registered trademark of General Motors Corporation</p>
<p></span></span><span style="font-family: Times-Roman;"></p>
<p align="left">for the City of Ontario (population 5,500). That level of economic damage is troubling and should be</p>
<p align="left">factored into the equation.</p>
<p align="left">Time is growing short. The dismantling of the plant is accelerating and – if it is allowed to proceed</p>
<p align="left">without a meaningful review – the company’s “asset” will have a dramatically decreased value. We</p>
<p align="left">urgently request a review and personal hearing with you to present the details of our case. A delegation</p>
<p align="left">from Mansfield will meet with you to present our case…any time, any place. We look forward to your</p>
<p align="left">prompt response.</p>
<p align="left">Sincerely,</p>
<p align="left">Kenneth Bender Donald Culliver Gary Utt</p>
<p align="left">Mayor of Ontario Mayor of Mansfield Richland County Commissioner</p>
<p align="left">cc: Mr. Ed Whitacre, Chairman GM Board of Directors</p>
<p>Members of the President&#8217;s Auto Task Force</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.toolanddieing.com/2009/07/19/community-still-fighting-for-gm-mansfield-letter-to-gm-ceo-henderson-questions-flint-plant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
